کارکردهای دراماتیک عمق میدان در سینمای ایران دهه ی 80

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد سینما، دانشکده ی هنرهای نمایشی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد ادبیات نمایشی، دانشکده ی هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه هنرهای نمایشی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

4 استادیارگروه ادبیات نمایشی، دانشکده ی هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
عمق میدان در سینمای ایران کارکردهای فراوانی داشته است اما تا کنون کمتر پژوهشی را می توان یافت
که به چگونگی مواجه ی فیلمسازان ایرانی با عمق میدان پرداخته باشد. این پژوهش تلاش میک‌ند تا با
نگرشی تحلیلی-توصیفی به چگونگی برخوردِ کارگردان های ایرانی با سطوح متفاوت تصویر در دهه ی 80
بپردازد. در گام نخست شش فیلم از سینمای ایران به عنوان جامعه ی آماری انتخاب شده است: شب های
روشن )فرزاد مؤتمن، 1381 (؛ من ترانه پانزده سال دارم )رسول صدرعاملی، 1381 (؛ گاوخونی )بهروز
افخمی، 1382 (؛ آتش سبز )محمدرضا اصلانی، 1386 (؛ شبان هروز )امید بنکدار و یکوان علی محمدی، 1387 (
و یه حبه قند )رضا میرکریمی، 1390 (. در ابتدا مقدمه ای کوتاه از روند توسع هی عمق میدان در سال های
ابتدایی سینما ارائه شده است. در ادامه سطح های متفاوت شکل گرفته در تصویر سینمایی معرفی و
شیوه ی بهره گیری از آن ها در فیلم های ایرانی واکاوی می شود. در بخش بعد نگرش های بدیع تر به عمق
میدان با محوریت آثار منتخب بررسی می شوند. در انتها روندی خاص که به تخت کردن تصاویر سینمایی
گرایش دارد، مورد واکاوی قرار می گیرد. هدف این پژوهش ترسیم شیوه ی برخورد کارگردان های ایرانی
با عمق میدان، در دهه ی 80 است تا تحول بیان تصویری فیلم های سینمای ایران در بهر هگیری از لایه های
مختلف تصویر آشکار شود

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Dramatic Functions of Depth of Field in Iranian Cinema 2001-2011

نویسندگان [English]

  • sajad sotoudeh 1
  • milad sotoudeh 2
  • ahmad alasti 3
  • mohammad jafar Yousefian Kenari 4
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Since the early days of cinema, depth of field has been used by film directors unconsciously. In 1940s, this
phenomenon transformed into a cinematic style. Many great directors turned it into a dramatic vehicle and
started to base their personal style according to depth of field’s characteristics. This phenomenon has had
many uses in Iranian Cinema but very few studies can be found analyzing Iranian film makers’ encounter
with it. These articles are usually affected by cultural studies and have the same approach to content and
meaning. This is the reason why we have few researches about visual aspects and cinematic structures of
the movies of Iranian cinema. This research is trying to investigate dramatic functions of depth of field
through a descriptive-analytical approach. To achieve this, six Iranian films from 2001 to 2011 have been
chosen as the statistical domain of the research: Bright Nights (Farzad Mo’tamen, 2001), I’m Taraneh,
Fifteen Years Old (Rasoul Sadr Ameli, 2002), Gavkhooni (The River’s End) (Afkhami, 2003), Green Fire
(Mohammad Reza Aslani, 2007), Day and night (Omid Bonakdar & Keyvan Ali Mohammadi, 2008) and
A Cube of Sugar (Reza Mir Karimi, 2011). Different aspects of these films have been analyzed, so that the
filmmaker’s approach toward depth of field becomes clear. It has to be mentioned that these films have been
made by different generations of Iranian film makers. Pre-revolutionary (Aslani), the first generation of
revolution (Sadr Ameli and Afkhami), the second generation of revolution (Mir Karimi and Mo’tamen) and
the new generation (Tavakoli, Bonakdar and Ali Mohammadi). Also, these films have been well-received
in internal and external festivals by film industry professional and critics. In the first part of this article
a short introduction of development process of depth of field usage has been given and an attempt has
been made to demonstrate the manner of usage of depth in cinematic image. Then, different levels of
cinematic image will be introduced and the methods of using it will be analyzed. These levels consist of:
background; mid-ground; foreground. To elaborate how Iranian directors function in different levels of
cinematic image, some scenes of the chosen films will be analyzed. For example, some films put all levels
of image into dramatic usage and create a dialectical relation between layers. In contrast, some other films
set distance between layers and each layer is occupied in ordering its own visual structure. In the next part,
more original views on depth of field and those Iranian directors who have succeed in enriching signified
meanings of their films by using depth of field, will be discussed. In the next section, thematic tendencies
and their picturing for enriching visual texture will be talked about. In the end of this study, a particular
process will be investigated that will result in flat image. The aim of this research is to project Iranian
directors of 2000s’ encounter with depth of field to reveal development of visual illustration of Iranian films
in usage of different levels of image.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Depth of Field
  • Iranian Cinema
  • Different Layers of Picture
  • Visual Aesthetics
  • Flat Picture
منابع
- گری نبرگ، کلمنت. ) 1385 (. نقاشی مدرنیس ، ت ترجمه ی محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی، مجل هی هنرهای تجسمی،
شماره ی 4، صص 48 - 53 .
- میتری، ژان. ) 1388 (. روا نشناسی و زیبای یشناسی سینم،ا ترجمه ی شاپور عظیمی، تهران: انتشارات سوره ی
مهر.
- Arnheim, Rudolf. (1957). Film as Art. University of California Press: California.
- Aumont, Jacques, Alain Bergala, Michele Marie, Marc Vernet. (1992). Aesthetics of Film,
Translated by Richard Neupert, University of Texas Press: Texas.
- Bazin, Andre. (1967). What is Cinema? VOL. I, Translated by Hugh Gray, University of California
Press: California.
- Bordwell, David and Kristin Thompson. (2008). Film Art an Introduction, Eighth Edition,
McGraw- Hill.
- Comolli, Jean-Louis. (1998). “Technique and Ideology: Camera, Perspective, Depth of field
(Parts 3 & 4)”, in Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader, Edited by Philip
Rosen, Columbia university press: Columbia, pp. 421-443.
- Deleuze, Gilles. (1989). Cinema 2: The Time-Image, Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and
Robert Galeta, The Athlone press.
- Harpole, Charles H. (1980). “Ideological and Technological Determinism in Deep-Space
Cinema Images: Issues in Ideology, Technological History, and Aesthetics”, Film Quarterly,
Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 11-22.
- Henderson, Brian. (1971). “The Long Take”, Film Comment, Volume7, No2, pp. 6-11.
- Henderson, Brian. (1970-1971). “Toward a Non-Bourgeois Camera Style”, Film Quarterly,
Vol.24, No.2, pp. 2-14.
- kovács, andrás bálint. (2007). Screening Modernism: European Art Cinema 1950–1980,
University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
- MacDougall, David. (1999). “When Less Is Less: The Long Take in Documentary”, in Film
Quarterly: Forty Years A Selection, Edited by Brian Henderson and Ann Martin, Berkeley:
University of California Press, pp 290-306.
- Morgan, Daniel. (2006). “Rethinking Bazin: Ontology and Realist Aesthetics”, Critical Inquiry,
Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 443-481.
- Paulus, Tom, (2007). “The View Across the Courtyard: Bazin and the Evolution of Depth
Style”, Film International, Vol. 5 Issue 6, pp. 62-75.
- Thompson, Kristin, David Bordwell, Janet Staiger (1985). “The Formulation of the Classical
Style 1909–28”, In the Classical Hollywood Cinema Film Style & Mode of Production to
1960, Routledge, pp. 245-472.
- Verstraten, Peter. (2012). “A Cinema of Modernist Poetic Prose: On Antonioni and Malick”,
Image & Narrative, Vol. 13, No 2. pp. 117-132.
- Vesia, Michael. (2004). “Transcendental Image of Time and Memory in Andrei Tarkovsky’s
Nostalghia”, Synoptique - An Online Journal of Film and Moving Image Studies, November 1.
- Ward, Peter. (2003). Picture Composition for Film and Television, Focal Press.
- Watson, Robert. (1990). Film and Television in Education: An Aesthetic Approach to the