جایگاه رسانه بازی ویدیویی در هنر معاصر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 رییس دانشکده پژوهشهای عالی هنر و کارآفرینی، گروه پژوهش هنر، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان.

2 کارشناسی‌ارشد پژوهش هنر، دانشکده پژوهش‌های عالی هنر و کارآفرینی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان

10.30480/dam.2021.2173.1471

چکیده

هنر هشتم عنوانی است که برخی به بازی‌های ویدیویی اطلاق نموده‌اند. از نخستین رویکردهای نهادی به این رسانه به مثابه‌ هنر در اواخر دهه‌ی 1980 م. حدود یک‌چهارم سده گذشته است، با این حال برخی منتقدان بر این باورند که بازی‌های ویدیویی هرگز نمی‌توانند آثار هنری باشند. مقاله حاضر برپایه‌ی یک پژوهش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی نگاشته شده که یافته‌های کیفی آن به شیوه‌ی اسنادی داده‌اندوزی شده‌اند. هدف محوری این پژوهش، تلاش در راستای مشخص نمودن جایگاه بازی‌های ویدیویی به‌عنوان یک رسانه‌ی معاصر در جهان هنر است. در این راستا، ابتدا به بررسی دو استدلال اصلی علیه هنر بودن رسانه‌ی بازی پرداخته شده؛ شاهکار و رد صلاحیت. در ادامه امکان هنر بودن بازی‌ها بر اساس نه دیدگاه رایج درباره‌ی هنر؛ تعریف کانت و نظریه‌های نو بازنمودی، بیانگری، شکل‌گرایی، نهادی، تاریخی، کارکردی، خوشه‌ای و هنر سرزنده پی‌جویی می‌گردد. به‌نظر می‌رسد بسیاری از بازی‌ها به‌سبب روایت‌های عمیق، فرم دلالت‌گر، ارتباط تاریخی با سینما، پذیرش از سوی جهان هنر، ساخت زیبایی‌شناسانه‌ی پیچیده، بیانگری احساسات و... می‌توانند اثر هنری باشند. در پایان با طرح مباحثی درباره‌ی هستی‌شناسی بازی ویدیویی در مقام یک هنر تعاملی، تلاش شده ماهیت این رسانه آشکارتر شود. همچنین، با بررسی مفاهیم و کاربرد‌های زیبایی‌شناختی بازی مشخص شده که ظرفیت‌های گسترده‌ای برای پژوهش در این حوزه وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Signification of Video Game as a Contemporary Art Medium

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sadreddin Taheri 1
  • Ahmad Mostafavi 2
1 Dean of Faculty of Research Excellence in Art and Entrepreneurship, Department of Art studies, Art University of Isfahan
2 MA. Student, Department of Art Studies, Faculty of Research Excellence in Art and Entrepreneurship, Art University of Isfahan
چکیده [English]

The 8th art is a title which sometimes used to refer to videogames. It’s been about 25 years from the late 1980’s first institutional considerations of videogames as art, when art museums began to show some old, first and second generation videogames in their collections. Video games in modern world have become cultural, economic and political tools to shape the thought of the younger generation. Examples of these games have made their way to the museums; scientific circles have focused on game aesthetic; and different countries are trying to take part in the growing market of game design. However, some critics still believe videogames can never be works of art. The mail question of this research is whether the medium of videogame is an artistic one or not. To answer that, we ask: based on which theory and definition of art we can consider videogame an artistic medium?
The present paper is based on an analytical descriptive study, whose qualitative data are compiled in a documentary manner. The main goal of this research is to attempt to determine the signification of video games as a new medium in the contemporary artworld.
The first step to solve the problem is to examine and criticize two main arguments against the artistic nature of this medium, Masterpiece argument and Disqualification argument. Followers of masterpiece argument believe that no video games ever produced which can be convincingly recognized as an artistic masterpiece. They have forgotten that artistic mediums like Minor Art / Low Art or Public Art / Mass Art, as well as any other newfound artistic medium, are incapable of producing a masterpiece at the beginning. Disqualification argument states that video games have features which does not exist in traditional arts and this denies their qualifications as artworks. One of the disadvantages of this argument is that its followers forget about other interactive forms of contemporary art like Participatory art. However, we should not forget that at the onset of the emergence of any new artistic medium (including photography and cinema), some people have resisted the acceptance of its artistic nature; but the new media has been recognized in the artworld, with the passage of time.
After adapting videogames to nine theories of art (Immanuel Kant’s point of view, and theories like: Neo-Representational, Expressivism, Formalism, Institutional, Historical, Functional, Cluster, and Lively Art), we can claim that, many video games can be artwork, due to complicated narrative, significant form, historical connection with cinema, acceptance by the artworld, sophisticated aesthetics, expressive feelings, etc. Although video games are still in their childhood, but they can stimulate artistic and aesthetic sentiment.
In the end, by discussing the ontology of video game as an interactive art, an attempt has been made to reveal the nature of this emerging artistic medium. Also, by examining the concepts and functions of game aesthetics, it turned out that there is a huge potential for research on the aesthetics of this contemporary artistic medium.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Contemporary Art
  • Artistic aspects of Videogames
  • Videogame Ontology
  • Videogame Aesthetics
  • فهرست منابع

    • حافظ‌نیا، محمدرضا (1392). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی. تهران: سمت.
    • جاویدصباغیان، مقداد، محمدرضا حسنایی (۱۳۹۱). «بازی رایانه‌ای در مقام متن هنری». هنرهای زیبا، هنرهای نمایشی و موسیقی، شماره(۱۷)، صفحه‌های ۶۹ ـ ۷۷.
    • کارول، نوئل (۱۳۹۲). درآمدی بر فلسفه‌ی هنر. ترجمه: صالح طباطبایی. تهران: متن. (نشر اثر اصلی ۱۹۹۹).
    • Aarseth, Espen (2014). “Ontology”. In: M. J. Wolf & B. Perron (Eds.), The Routledge companion to video game studies. New York: Routledge.
    • Beardsley, Monroe C., Michael J. Wreen, Donald M. Callen (1982). The aesthetic point of view: selected essays. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    • Bell, Clive (2012). Art. Charleston: Create Space.
    • Bishop, Claire (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, New York: Verso Books.
    • Clarke, Andy, Grethe Mitchell (Eds.) (2013). Videogames and art. Second edition. Bristol: Intellect.
    • Danto, Arthur (1964). “The artworld”. The journal of philosophy, 61(19), pp. 571-584.
    • Dickie, George (1982). Aesthetics: an introduction. Indianapolis: Pegasus.
    • Ebert, Roger. (2010). “Video games can never be art”. Retrieved May 16, 2019. From: rogerebert.com.
    • Gaut, Berys (2000). “Art as a Cluster Concept”. In: N. Carroll (Ed.), Theories of Art Today. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
    • Gaut, Berys Nigel (2010). A philosophy of cinematic art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Gee, James Paul (2006). “Why game studies now? Video games: A new art form”. Games and culture, 1(1), pp. 58-61.
    • Jenkins, Henry (2005). “Games, the new lively art”. In: J. Raessense & J. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 175-189). Cambridge: MIT Press.
    • Kant, Immanuel (1987). Critique of Judgment. Werner S. Pluhar (Transl.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
    • Keo, Mary. (2017). Graphical Style in Video Games. Bachelor’s thesis. HAMK Häme University of Applied Sciences.
    • Levinson, Jerrold (1979). “Deffinig Art Historically”. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 19(3), pp. 232-250.
    • Lopes, Dominic (2010). A philosophy of computer art. London: Routledge.
    • Martin, Brett (2013). “Should videogames be viewed as art?”. In: G. Mitchell & A. Clark (Eds.), Videogames and art (pp. 201-210). Bristol: Intellect Ltd.
    • Niedenthal, Simon (2009). “What We Talk About When We Talk About Game Aesthetics”. In: Breaking New Ground: Innovations in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. (pp. 1-9). Proceedings of DiGRA.
    • Seldes, Gilbert (1924). Seven Lively Arts. New York: Sagamore.
    • Smuts, Aaron (2005). “Are Video Games Art?”. Contemporary Aesthetics, 3(1), 6.
    • Smuts, Aaron (2009). “What Is Interactivity?”. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 43(4), pp. 53-73.
    • Sommerseth, Hanna (2009). “Exploring Game Aesthetics”. Presented at the DiGRA Conference.
    • Tavinor, Grant (2009). The art of videogames. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Tavinor, Grant (2011). “Video games as mass art”. Contemporary Aesthetics, 9(1), 9.
    • Tavinor, Grant. (2013). “Videogames”. In: Gaut, B. N. & Lopes, D. (Eds). The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics (pp. 587-596). New York: Routledge.
    • Tavinor, Grant. (2014). “Art and Aesthetics”. In: Wolf, M. J. P. & Perron, B. (Eds). The Routledge Companion to Video Game Studies (pp. 85-92). New York: Routledge.
    • Weitz, Morris. (1956). “The role of theory in aesthetics”. The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism, 15(1), pp. 27-35.