<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle></JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-2649</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>5</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Expressive Evolution of Hybrid Cinema and Reproduction of Reality;
Case Study: King Kong (1933) and (2005)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Expressive Evolution of Hybrid Cinema and Reproduction of Reality;
Case Study: King Kong (1933) and (2005)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>71</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>55</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">52</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30480/dam.2012.52</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sheikh Mehdi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Laleh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kharazian</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>03</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Expressive evolution of hybrid cinema in reproduction of reality and cultural logic of capitalism is &lt;br /&gt;the aim of this article. Hybrid is a new method for production of laboratory and commercial goods, &lt;br /&gt;with modern composition and implication characteristics. It has been posed firstly, in animal and &lt;br /&gt;plant species biology and then extended to industry and culture. The cultural logic of late capitalism &lt;br /&gt;which is rooted in diversity seeking has promoted such an aesthetic. In contemporary cinema &lt;br /&gt;culture, hybridization of reality and imagination has been basically changed; because of access to &lt;br /&gt;the modern digital techniques through simulation, in which reality approach has been replaced by &lt;br /&gt;virtual strategy. According to political economy analysis of the Fredric Jameson’s typology the way &lt;br /&gt;of expressing imagery signs applied in reproducing the reality in cinema has been accompanied by &lt;br /&gt;the reality concept changes in various capitalism areas. Also, Jean Baudrillard believes that the hyper &lt;br /&gt;reality signs do not refer to any object and are just media-made virtuality which has been referred as &lt;br /&gt;simulacrum. The theoretical backgrounds of the present study were formed based on review of the key &lt;br /&gt;reasons for the reality success in cinema concerning style and technology, and with regard to various &lt;br /&gt;cultural logic eras, as well as capitalism development. The research theoretical framework is based &lt;br /&gt;on a combination of typology and political economy growth and capitalism development, aimed at &lt;br /&gt;analyzing the hybrid position in reality reproducing. Among the post-modern thinkers’ ideas, we have &lt;br /&gt;used those of Fredric Jameson and Jean Baudrillard; because of their critics on capitalism developments &lt;br /&gt;and the typology application in imagery media. Studying the pro and con ideas in this regard &lt;br /&gt;requires explaining that promotion of the visual images’ quality in digital cinema has removed the &lt;br /&gt;distance between reality and imagination. The main goal of this research is to recognize different capabilities &lt;br /&gt;of combining a live film and animation, in hybrid cinema history. It doubtlessly is beneficial &lt;br /&gt;for the Iranian cinema, theoretically and practically. The basic hypothesis of the research states that: &lt;br /&gt;in hybrid cinema, the reality reproduction both in live film and animation has been realized based on &lt;br /&gt;simulating the imitative signs in symbolic signs according to capitalism’s cultural logic. Therefore, &lt;br /&gt;imaginary signs don’t refer to any real object, but to the film world. Here, we are going to consider and &lt;br /&gt;analyze two films made based on the King Kong (1933 and 2005) in the early and late capitalism era, &lt;br /&gt;under the influence of realism and post- modernism cultural logic. The findings of the research show &lt;br /&gt;that the modern expression mode of the current cinema has consolidated the hybrid cinema’s multiple &lt;br /&gt;systems, through digital systems performance. It also uses miseenscen’s general expression, in order &lt;br /&gt;to apply the computerized unlimited layer age. The comparative analysis of the two era’s cinema reveals &lt;br /&gt;that applying live film in hybrid cinema has led to dominance of the hyper reality space; also it &lt;br /&gt;has entered the real personages into the virtual space</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Expressive evolution of hybrid cinema in reproduction of reality and cultural logic of capitalism is &lt;br /&gt;the aim of this article. Hybrid is a new method for production of laboratory and commercial goods, &lt;br /&gt;with modern composition and implication characteristics. It has been posed firstly, in animal and &lt;br /&gt;plant species biology and then extended to industry and culture. The cultural logic of late capitalism &lt;br /&gt;which is rooted in diversity seeking has promoted such an aesthetic. In contemporary cinema &lt;br /&gt;culture, hybridization of reality and imagination has been basically changed; because of access to &lt;br /&gt;the modern digital techniques through simulation, in which reality approach has been replaced by &lt;br /&gt;virtual strategy. According to political economy analysis of the Fredric Jameson’s typology the way &lt;br /&gt;of expressing imagery signs applied in reproducing the reality in cinema has been accompanied by &lt;br /&gt;the reality concept changes in various capitalism areas. Also, Jean Baudrillard believes that the hyper &lt;br /&gt;reality signs do not refer to any object and are just media-made virtuality which has been referred as &lt;br /&gt;simulacrum. The theoretical backgrounds of the present study were formed based on review of the key &lt;br /&gt;reasons for the reality success in cinema concerning style and technology, and with regard to various &lt;br /&gt;cultural logic eras, as well as capitalism development. The research theoretical framework is based &lt;br /&gt;on a combination of typology and political economy growth and capitalism development, aimed at &lt;br /&gt;analyzing the hybrid position in reality reproducing. Among the post-modern thinkers’ ideas, we have &lt;br /&gt;used those of Fredric Jameson and Jean Baudrillard; because of their critics on capitalism developments &lt;br /&gt;and the typology application in imagery media. Studying the pro and con ideas in this regard &lt;br /&gt;requires explaining that promotion of the visual images’ quality in digital cinema has removed the &lt;br /&gt;distance between reality and imagination. The main goal of this research is to recognize different capabilities &lt;br /&gt;of combining a live film and animation, in hybrid cinema history. It doubtlessly is beneficial &lt;br /&gt;for the Iranian cinema, theoretically and practically. The basic hypothesis of the research states that: &lt;br /&gt;in hybrid cinema, the reality reproduction both in live film and animation has been realized based on &lt;br /&gt;simulating the imitative signs in symbolic signs according to capitalism’s cultural logic. Therefore, &lt;br /&gt;imaginary signs don’t refer to any real object, but to the film world. Here, we are going to consider and &lt;br /&gt;analyze two films made based on the King Kong (1933 and 2005) in the early and late capitalism era, &lt;br /&gt;under the influence of realism and post- modernism cultural logic. The findings of the research show &lt;br /&gt;that the modern expression mode of the current cinema has consolidated the hybrid cinema’s multiple &lt;br /&gt;systems, through digital systems performance. It also uses miseenscen’s general expression, in order &lt;br /&gt;to apply the computerized unlimited layer age. The comparative analysis of the two era’s cinema reveals &lt;br /&gt;that applying live film in hybrid cinema has led to dominance of the hyper reality space; also it &lt;br /&gt;has entered the real personages into the virtual space</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hybrid cinema</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Realism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">late capitalism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">King Kong</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://dam.journal.art.ac.ir/article_52_09aea35c737d06a7bb24354555d3685d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
